Neo-Archaism and Conflicting Psycho-Constructs: The Necessity of Need-Based Identity Politics

Abstract

Contemporary Iranian society is facing young identity seekers or "neo-archaists", those who know the ancient culture as a precious treasure of meaning and supplier of a superior identity. The discourse representations of neo-archaists indicate that they have a special psychological structure that can fuel cultural and intergroup encounters (between supporters of ancient culture and Islam). Othering and Identifying Islam as a source of destruction; Considering the position of ancient culture and Islam as unequal; considering the Islamic Republic and its agents as the root of misfortunes; and the feeling of ontological fear, worthlessness, anger, and disgust are among these characteristics. Using the opinions of social psychologists such as "Pratto," " Glasford," "Kelman," "Nadler," "Janoff-Bulman," and "Werther," the present article proposes the assumption that need-based Identity politics is necessary to avoid the aggressiveness of the neo-archaists. In this regard, cultural policymakers must first identify their previous shortcomings and then, by removing them, in their new programs, they should fulfill the three fundamental and psychological needs of the social identity of neo-archaists, which are as follows: a sense of "self- esteem," "belonging," and " self-integrity". Thus, it is very possible for groups to avoid conflict and move towards compromise.